That means that PureVPN allows security auditing firm KPMG to audit PureVPN’s service at any time. They even took it one step further by implementing the first “always-on” audit. Both providers have a strict no-logs policy, yet PureVPN is the only one to release a third-party audit of their claims. While IPVanish supports more protocols, PureVPN offers a few extra privacy features that bring it to the forefront. If you want to avoid company blocklists with a dynamic IP, IPVanish will make this easier. If you need to route data through a static IP, PureVPN is better. The best VPN service in this category will come down to your use case. Granted, IPVanish does give users access to over 40,000 dynamic IP addresses. Looking at their global networks, PureVPN offers over 6,500 servers, and IPVanish offers about half of that with 2,000 servers. Average download speeds for IPVanish were fast for nearby servers, whereas PureVPN connections remained steady across servers. The real difference came down to consistency. Our experts experienced essentially the same speed loss while testing both providers (62% for IPVanish and 63% for PureVPN). The main difference we found is that PureVPN delivers consistent speeds across servers while IPVanish performs better on specific servers. For this category, we look at speed loss, network size, and connection options.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |